|
Sakonnet Times article: August 5, 2010
TIVERTON — The Town Council Monday night, July 19, again postponed any decision about rezoning the neighborhood along Riverside Drive in which the Tiverton Yacht Club (TYC) is located.
Instead the council (with five members present) continued the by now
marathon public hearing to Aug. 10 at 7 p.m., in the high school
auditorium.
That’s the arena in which on June 14, and again last Monday night
for nearly three hours on each occasion the feuding combatants — the
TYC in one corner and on the last occasion and its residential
neighbors this time in the other — faced off.
Monday night was the night for the neighboring opponents to have
their say. They were led by David Campbell, a lawyer who lives next
door to the TYC at 76 Riverside Drive.
“It’s hard to say where to begin; this is wrong on so many levels”
he said when he began his attack. The zoning proposal “benefits no
one but the Tiverton Yacht Club.”
“This town has never seen a proposal like this” he said.
Mr. Campbell at 76 Riverside drive lives adjacent and just to the
north of the TYC. His home is also directly across the street and
about the same distance from the proposed Trinity marina, a
multi-million dollar “world class marina and yacht yard” as its
chairman Keith Laker recently described it.
Trinity will reportedly accommodate 74 boats some as large as 300
feet and will have parking for 100 cars.
The proposed change in the zoning designation is in the residential
area east of Riverside drive from R-40 residential to a new category
called Waterfront Related (WR). The new designation would impact the
Tiverton Yacht Club and 11 or so nearby properties.
As things now stand the club’s properties are on both sides of
Riverside Drive and carry two different zoning designations. Therein
lies the root of the feud.
Since 2003 when its old clubhouse burned to the ground the yacht
club has been engaged in an effort to rebuild. Because a clubhouse
in a residential R-40 zone is a non-conforming use any effort to
rebuild requires a special use permit obtained from the town zoning
board of review.
The club’s efforts to rebuild have been thwarted many times by
objections from neighbors to the north and south who have opposed
its reconstruction and interim operation and repeatedly objected to
requests for special use permits.
Under the “Waterfront Related District” category a yacht club or
marina would be a permitted use and would not have to file for
repeated special use permits.
Monday night armed with an inches-thick three-ring binder stuffed
with 20 exhibits copies of which in separate binders he provided to
council members, . Campbell and an array of witnesses he had
marshaled for the occasion launched into a critique of the zoning
proposal and the TYC.
Citing the club’s use of its property since the fire as it waits
approval to rebuild, Mr. Campbell said, “it’s a derelict use. It’s a
dump.”
“I look at it every morning when I raise the shades” he said. “The weeds are six feet high.” Mr. Campbell said he sees it every day. “There’s enough chain link fence for a zoo.” There’s “port-a-potties” he said there’s “rubble.”
He characterized the TYC as saying to the town council in effect "we
want you to change for us against the will of everyone in the
neighborhood.”
Mr. Campbell said the zoning change is inconsistent with the town’s
comprehensive plan by promoting a “marine-related” use for a
residential zone when it should be doing the exact opposite
promoting such a use instead for non-residential zones.
Proponents of the zoning change however say that the designation
“waterfront-related” is different from “marine-related” and is not
as linked to working boatyards and similar uses as is contemplated
by the term “marine.”
Mr. Campbell said the zoning proposal “is dressed up as spot zoning”
and accused the town of being “incapable of saying no to the
Tiverton Yacht Club.”
He told the council that approving the change would be “an obscene
gesture to the neighborhood.”
Mr. Campbell had good words for Trinity Marina. They comply with
requirement, they're considerate and if they do as they propose,
property values should increase. “They would be a good neighbor,
a welcome neighbor.”, he said.
Mr. Campbell closed his comments by saying "I don't want to look at
a dump” and referred to the TYC at one point as “this thuggish
organization.”
Other opponents took up the same refrain. Charlie Moran said it was
illegal spot zoning. John Moran, Jr. said the club had
misrepresented itself over the years and objected to a club with
members who come from other towns trying to rezone their
neighborhood.
Matthew Moran said he didn't trust the yacht club. “They want to
have a four story monstrosity” he said. John Moran said "I don't
trust them either.” And there were others who opposed the change.
Both a certified planner and a real estate broker hired by Mr.
Campbell for their expertise spoke against the proposal.
Only a few witnesses in as many minutes were allowed to testify in
favor of the proposal at this portion of the hearing as the clock
ticked down adjournment for the evening.
On Aug. 10, attorneys for each side will have an opportunity to
present their arguments. Plans call for no further testimony, though
the public hearing is not closed. It is not clear whether a majority
vote or a 60 percent vote of council members is required.
|
||
|
|